katestine: (reading)
I assume there's something about the publishing calendar that caused me to read lots of new science fiction and fantasy books toward the end of last year and the beginning of this year. Some were amazing, but there was a lot that I couldn't finish.

Ready Player One isn't very newish, but I read it late last year and liked it so much, it was the only book I re-read last year. My ladylove complained that the female character was an NPC - I'd argue she's a Hermione and there's almost no character development for anyone in the book - but who doesn't love the poor kid who uses arcane knowledge to win in a dystopian world story? Non-nerds, maybe, since the book is all about 80s trivia.

I started 3 different books bc Neil Gaiman wrote (part of) them. The Sleeper and the Spindle was published as a standalone story in a heavily illustrated edition and is quite good if you like fairy tale retellings with a twist.

I'm not sure why I picked up Trigger Warning, considering I have no trouble finding disturbing books on my own and it's not like Neil Gaiman is known for heartwarming tales with fluffy bunnies and unicorns. I also don't get what the book is: I know I've read some of those stories before. At a certain point I came to my senses and put it down.

I read all but one of the stories in Rags & Bone, which also includes The Sleeper and the Spindle, but even as a completist, there was no way I would read a creepy retelling of "The Monkey's Paw". I didn't love any of the other stories enough to think the book worthwhile.

Naomi Novik's Uprooted is creepy and contains all the fairy tale elements, but is an amazing book selection from TRQ. It pays to be old friends with a MITSFS cardholder, let me tell you. It starts with the sacrificial maiden, who is far from perfect and very plucky, and gets epic. Highly recommended.

The Sword of Summer is the start of another Rick Riordan tetralogy, this one about Norse gods. More observant readers of his other books will find it interesting the hero's name is Magnus Chase. I started reading it right after reading Michael Chabon's essay about his relationship with Norse mythology, so I should've loved it. Instead, it irritated me, despite being set in Boston, and I have no desire to read any more from this series, even though I inhaled the Greek tetralogy and read all the Roman ones. Maybe someday I'll read the Egyptian one.

I was so excited to get my hands on Jim Butcher's Aeronaut's Windlass, but it was basically steampunk Honor Harrington - it even has cats!!!! - so I read the last 50 pages and decided I didn't care what happened to the characters in between. I don't understand what happened to all the depth his writing gained over the first dozen Harry Dresden, but I need to stop trying to read his books.

I loved Michael Chabon's Sherlock Holmes essay, so I got Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's Mycroft Holmes at the right time too. And still couldn't like it. Apparently the basketball player has taken up all sorts of hobbies since his NBA career ended and I'm totally cool with polymathic dilettantism. OTOH, it's not a very good book. It tries to give back story as to why this Holmes brother is such a loner, but it just doesn't feel true to what we know about Mycroft and instead feels like Marty Stuism.

I didn't read The Flux for four months after buying it, partly bc I read the free sample from Amazon and got turned off. I get that [livejournal.com profile] theferret was trying to do an action opening that quickly told us what the tensions were, but the more I think about it, the less I think it was appropriate to the characters or the rest of the book. The rest of the book is very good though and if you liked Flex at all, you'll probably like The Flux. I liked how he used the "obsession=magic" to create cinemancers although I really want to find that post someone wrote that explained all the references, bc while I noticed the mentions of Svtug Pyho, I missed the Sverfgnegre ones until the second reading.

I was all set to pay $15 for an early copy of Gentleman Jole and the Red Queen, bc not only is it the new Lois McMaster Bujold book, but it's about my favorite character, Cordelia. Then the early sample of the book on Baen's website read like fanfic and I decided to wait until the print copy came out, hoping it would get better. It did, a little. It's nothing like Cordelia's Honor or even A Civil Affair. In her mind, I think LMB thought she was writing a more mature book, that she could write a book that would be interesting without space battles, that allowed her to explore Cordelia's Betan side. She's written books like that - I really enjoyed Cryoburn and Lord Vorpatril's Alliance - but this book was boring. Once you know the big secret of the book, you've gotten half the pleasure of the book; the rest is just a telling of how that plays out in the post-Cryoburn world. Lots of things happen that remind me of the aimlessness of a lot of contemporary romance novels, although the last third of the book had a lot of great lines that made me LOL and/or scribble them down for my quotes page.

Sadly, the only book I'm anticipating at this point is the next Rivers of London book, which I don't expect to like and isn't out until August 2 :(
katestine: (reading)
My Orwell fandom didn't last long. I was excited to pick up All Art is Propaganda, thinking it would be essay after essay of his writing and his brilliance. The first essay was 3 chapters on Dickens, which was fine because he rationalized my dislike of Dickens, arguing against the common view of him as a social reformer in that he wrote about a very narrow band of commoner, he doesn't write about actual change (either in social conditions or in his characters), and the only way he sees change happening is through the benevolence of the government or the people who run the country. Which was an interesting perspective. Then I read an essay about pulp magazines aimed at young men that don't exist anymore, probably the forerunner of comic books.1 Again, he had interesting insights into who actually read them and why. He has a conspiracy theorist take on them, arguing they are released by Big Publishing to keep lower class men thinking the right way, which is to say, docile and happy to serve their betters. The next essays were reviews of long ago, not very important theater productions and I realized that I'd never read the entire book, so I started skipping around. I've never seen The Great Dictator, so it was interesting to hear his views on that movie, and it's fun reading such a well-regarded and skilled (dare I say snarky?) writer dump on Dali (he was a total freak, says a former board member of the Lesbian Sex Mafia), Kipling, Swift, and Tolstoy. OTOH, zomg, not everything is about class warfare. It was reasonable, in describing his experiences in the Spanish Civil War to talk about socialism vs communism vs fascism, but there's only so much of that I can take. *sighs* I'm not even going to dig up the other book of his essays, because if the critical essays are this full of class warfare, I can't imagine how much there'll be in his narrative essays.

The Amazon reviewers went crazy over all of Roger Ebert's essay collections, so I bought The Great Movies when it was a Kindle deal. It is very good: he is insightful and has such interesting things to say, I want to go back and watch movies I hated because he points things out I never noticed. OTOH, there's an awful lot of dead babies in great movies. I may someday get around to re-reading and finishing the book, maybe when our home is set up for movie watching.

At this point, I went looking on the Internet for lists of great essayists and really didn't find anyone who sounded like a great writer, with great insights, preferably a snarky one. I did come across a tome called The Best American Essays of the Century. I suspect Joyce Carol Oates and I diverge in our views of what constitutes a great essay. The second one I read was about suicide and after reading a few more, I decided not to torture myself by reading the whole thing.

So... who's a good writer with keen insight?
_________________
Footnote )
katestine: (reading)
I don't remember when Laurie King's The Game got on my list. I'd heard intriguing things about her Sherlock Holmes-retires-to-Sussex-to-raise-bees series and The Game takes the detective to India, where he participates in the Great Game and rescues Kim. Yaay mashups! Except the series/book is terrible, a total Mary Sue, wherein spoiler for prior books in the series ) She's just the pluckiest girl-detective evuh, with men falling at her feet and dropping clues. ugh. Apparently the following book in the series involves Gilbert & Sullivan. ugh. Just ugh. I can't believe she sold any books, let alone more than one, and I wish she'd given her characters different names.

After I finished, I realized I could just read Kipling's Kim, which doesn't have the great detective, but is generally considered one of the classic adventure tales. It lived up to its reputation, although it was about a third too long and I got antsy toward the end. I bet the Edwardian young boys ate that stuff up though and I can't wait to read some of his shorter stories to my son and nephew. I feel funny about how interested I became in (visiting) India after reading it though: I sort of wanted to mention this to my Indian former colleagues, but didn't.

Stick recommended Lyndsay Faye's Dust and Shadow, which is Sherlock Holmes meets Jack the Ripper. Faye gets the tone right and there's a lot to enjoy, despite the non-Doyleish touches, e.g. important female character, extensive use of the Irregulars, Faye's choice of villain and denouement.

Jon mentioned that they'd figure out who Jack the Ripper was. I went and read all the news stories and they really haven't. Some dude saw From Hell, bought a shawl of doubtful provenance, found someone to do some mitochondrial DNA tests (which didn't eliminate the guy he accused), and is now promoting his book in the Daily Mail, which proves exactly nothing. augh. I then read the entire list of suspects on Wikipedia and y'know what? We really have no fucking clue who did it. Only two of the guys seem to have had opportunity: e.g. Walter Sickert, the artist who occasionally gets accused of being part of the royalist conspiracy, was in freakin' France the night of more than one of the murders, but is still considered a "suspect". WTF?
katestine: (reading)
It was actually Lois McMaster Bujold herself who recommended Ben Aaronovitch's Rivers of London series on her Baen board. The premise is that a newbie London cop sees a ghost and inadvertently joins the magical unit of the police force. It's very much a police procedural - I was very creeped out to realize just how much surveillance there is in London and I definitely learned more about committing suicide by Tube than I should've. Aaronovitch isn't too heavy-handed with the magic, the monsters are often original, and I liked the way he wove the history of London into the story. I was jonesing every time I finished a book, until the most recently published one, Broken Homes, which ended on a note I'm not sure I believe. Very highly recommended if you like urban paranormal or police procedurals.

Strictly speaking, there's no magic in Donna Leon's Commissario Brunetti series, unless you consider La Serenissima magical. I got the first book as a Kindle daily deal and couldn't figure out if the references were tourist things. They are not: Leon has lived in Venice for over 25 years and further books got into more details no tourist would see. I was particularly interested because Julian and I had talked about how there's very little violent crime in Venice, because there are only 60K permanent residents and it's very hard to run from the police if you don't know the byways. My first problem with the series is that I got hungry all the time: Brunetti stops at little sandwich shops or goes to the market for perfect food every day and I'd get upset that I can't visit Cantinone gia Schiavi without getting on a plane. I stopped after 5 books because major spoiler ). Still recommended for atmosphere.

I don't know who suggested Max Gladstone's Three Parts Dead because they weren't logged into LiveJournal at the time. It should've been right up my alley: in this world, lawyer-stuff is magic and the main character is a feisty young associate on her first case. Unfortunately, Gladstone develops this premise in ways I didn't particularly enjoy and I struggled to finish it. I read the second book in the series, Two Serpents Rise, because I wanted to see what he did with a neo-Aztec theme - I don't think there are any lawyers in that one - and I barely finished it. Others have enjoyed it more though, so you may like it.
katestine: (reading)
I didn't realize Skin Game (aka the new Jim Butcher) was out, so I was surprised when it arrived at the library. I read the first few chapters, got intimidated by its size -- and read the last chapter or two. And decided I didn't need to read the intervening 400 pages. It's not much of a spoiler to say Harry has problems that look pretty awful, adversaries who want to kill him, and yet he somehow finds the compromises necessary to save his skin, although his friends are endangered. I had it on my bedside for 3 weeks and happily returned it without reading any more. We've seen this story before, it's just powers&monster inflation.

Meanwhile, I picked up the audio version of Storm Front, read by Spike from Buffy, for cheap on Audible. I'd been so sad that I couldn't get them for the longest time -- and then it turns out there's nothing particularly interesting about James Marsters' performance. It's a good reason, but it's no different to me than reading the book on paper, which I already did.

It took me forever to hunt down Ghoul Goblin, one of the original Harry Dresden graphic novels and it was totally worth it. Harry goes out of town to help a cursed family in a story that I found hard to guess.

I wish I could get into the Codex Alera books or had faith in the new Cinder Spires series.

To be continued...
katestine: (reading)
Even though reading about Benjamin Franklin as a kid is pretty much what got me into reading history for fun, I never had the urge to read any of the Founding Father doorstops. Then I learned that Christopher Hitchens had written a short! biography of Thomas Jefferson, so Jon and I read it together, sitting side-by-side. (which totally disgusted the 9yo.)

With all the Founding Fathers I'll discuss in this post, it was interesting to hear about where they came from. I once posited to my boss the early American history PhD that the US got really lucky, that our Constitution and government is so sturdy/awesome because we went for independence at a time when a group of smart people (and polymaths!) were thinking about good government. Before Hitchens' bio, I hadn't known that he'd helped write Virginia's state constitution, which gave the Virginia delegation a certain practical experience. Of the authors I've been reading, Hitchens is the most positive toward Jefferson, but even he calls him "a socialist rationcard bureaucrat" and describes one particular flip flop with "to say that this involved him in some rapid changes of principle and allegiance would be to put it very mildly."

Hitchens' book is part of a series called "Eminent Lives", which is totally catnip for this polymath, except that the choice of subjects is a little... idiosyncratic. It includes Jefferson, Washington, Grant... Freud, Caravaggio, and Francis Crick. oh well. The Washington bio is written by Paul Johnson, whom Julian highly recommended, so I listened to half of it in the car with him and read the other half by myself.

Washington seems to me to have been very ambitious and very lucky. Read more... ) It made me want to read more about the Revolutionary war. I'd love a relatively simple, short overview book, but I'll probably end up reading about the Battle of Brooklyn (there's a landmark near my subway station!), Morristown (recommended by the early AmH PhD), and Valley Forge (near my in-laws'). I also hadn't known about his Western land speculations - given his strong belief in the expansion of this nation and his influence on others, I believe this was a major factor in how our country developed westward - or that he too ran his estates as scientifically as possible.

Johnson lurves Hamilton, so Julian dug up a short biography by Richard Brookhiser that I believe was associated with the exhibit [livejournal.com profile] regyt and I et al. saw. I believe it is impossible to write a biography and remain objective about your subject - it's a year of your life, after all - but Brookhiser was a curator too, so he's not even close to objective. Brookhiser covers all the basics in a memorable fashion - this is less common than you'd think - but the book was also chock full of tidbits, like quoting the Founding Fathers talking about their "deep affection" for each other or mentioning that NYC had 35 lawyers and 12x as many prostitutes in those times. At the same time, Hamilton was a pretty sharp guy who rose from penniless West Indies orphan to secretary (and architect!) of the Treasury and second-in-command of the army, mostly by being more intellectual and incisive than those around him. Brookhiser is more cynical about Washington, calling him a master of ambition. Bottom-line, I have a thing for smart, if sometimes concupiscible, people.
katestine: (reading)
I first came across Susanna Kearsley because one of her books was an Amazon Daily Deal. I meant to get some of her books out from the library, but then I got Rose Garden for my birthday. It's a pretty good romance novel about a woman who visits Cornwall to grieve and starts unpredictably travelling back to the 18th century. There's just enough to the book to lift it above the genre. Kearsley is no Susan Elizabeth Phillips, let alone Alice Hoffman, but if I ever plow through the pile of random fiction I've bought in Amazon Daily Deals, I plan to read more of her books.

I've wanted to read something by Joe Hill for a while, partly bc his work is so well-reviewed. I don't know why I'm so tickled by reading something by Stephen King's son, considering I've only read 2 Stephen King books (Firestarter and On Writing). But Heart-Shaped Box sounded too... horror-ful. The description I read of Horns, in trying to avoid spoilers, made it sound like a supernatural romp, which it most certainly is not. Yes, it's about a guy who wakes up one morning to find that he has horns on his head and that people who see them will tell him the truth about anything, even if he doesn't want them to. It's also about faith and beauty and the ugliness inside everyone. There's a section of the book that's the thoughts of a psychopath. Hill pulls the whole thing together, with little details all tying into one lovely bow. I gulped it down in 3 days and recommended it highly next time I was asked for a book recommendation.

I thought Steve McHugh's first book, Crimes Against Magic, had a stupid protagonist, but then I bought the second book, Born of Hatred, so maybe I'm not so bright either. I spent the last 50 pages stopping every few pages to whine at [livejournal.com profile] lawnrrd about how awful it was. It's just so annoying that McHugh created such an interesting premise and doesn't think through what a reasonable person would do. There's a third book in the series...

I haven't kept up with my list of books that are coming out that I'm looking forward to, largely bc I've gotten bored of the writers I used to read so religiously. Alice Hoffman doesn't write very quickly so when her last book was a dud, I didn't pay attention for a while. Then during my breakup with Julian, I watched Practical Magic with Jon, which was high-larious, so I looked her up and discovered she'd written a short book and is about to release a longer book set in Coney Island. (yaay!) The short book, Survival Lessons, is about life lessons she learned in chemo for breast cancer. There's nothing really new in there - I assume that dying, like falling in love, is one of those experiences where you realize that all the trite things that are written about the experience are true - but she writes so beautifully, I highlighted a fair bit. I hope Barnes & Noble had a pile of this book near the checkout counter.
katestine: (geek)
[Poll #1942171]

I was feeling bad about how long it's been since I posted a Humpday poll - this might be the first in 2013 - but then I discovered the LJ poll creator is barely functional anymore. Grr.

Also, it's really weird reading my notes from 2011 or earlier.
katestine: (reading)
I went to the bookstore at midnight to pick up HP & the Goblet of Fire; I asked my dad to get me HP & the Order of the Phoenix next time he went to CostCo; I had HP & the Half-Blood Prince waiting for me at the library when I saw someone reading it on the subway and decided it was too long, I wouldn't read it. I wrote off J. K. Rowling as an author whose celebrity had made her uneditable (I'm looking at you, Laurell K. Hamilton), read the last two pages of the series, and never really thought about her books again.

...until we were out top-roping and Jon told me the story of The Cuckoo's Calling's unveiling. Short version: after her first post-Potter book was panned, Rowling published a book under a pseudonym, but someone leaked it and she's pissed, but now this book that only had a few hundred copies sold is selling out. Apparently there were suspicions before the leak that this was not a first novel.

I can see why Rowling tried that route. It's a pretty good book, with good workmanship, although I'm not sure I'd say it can't be a first novel. It's a mystery that doesn't quite follow all the noir tropes, set in London. Knowing that Rowling wrote it, it's hard not to compare the victim, a world-famous supermodel, to her first series and wonder if she's always been interested in the effects of celebrity. If you like mysteries and/or fashion, I'd recommend it as a light read.

Reading it made me realize that Rowling has spent 10,000 hours writing and The Cuckoo's Calling shows that craft. Alas, she didn't have as good a story to tell in Casual Vacancy. I stuck with it for 50 pages, even though it's rambling, with too many characters, many of whom are unlikeable and poorly (she probably thought it was mysteriously) introduced, fighting over stupid stuff I don't care about. Small town England is probably interesting in the right hands, but churning out grammatical sentences doesn't make it so.
katestine: (galleon)
[Poll #1923661]

I could buy all of the above + another e-copy of Shards of Honor, for a little over $10 as part of the current Humble Bundle. I read the first chapters of 5 of them and while I enjoyed them, the backs of the books sound like not my thing. I'd be buying the bundle in case I ever want to read the xkcd book on my iPad (instead of online), in hopes that the cute premise of Machine of Death is well executed, and as an intro to more Holly Black.

Speaking of Holly Black, would anyone like to recommend a book about con artists? I don't want to read a fourth Curse Workers book, bc I think that story is done, but I want a narrative that shows how they work.

I was jonesing to read all day yesterday, apparently, which is why I read so many first chapters: I wouldn't read a whole book bc zomg I have too much to do and I haven't gotten any of it done, but just one chapter... yeah. Then we watched The Lightning Thief, which was more horrible than I could've imagined. Then I started reading an urban paranormal book that was so terrble, I was on the second page when I told Jon it was too terrible to read any more. The best thing about him being around is 20mins later, he took the iPad out of my hands and made me stop reading, bc even though it was terrible, I'd've been up until 2 or 3.

I almost bought a Lilith Saintcrow book in yesterday's Kindle Daily Deal, until I discovered I could get it from the NYPL, if I was willing to wait 2 months. The reviews are terrible, but I love the idea of Sherlock Holmes' brain being a paranormal condition. I can't tell if I've heard of Saintcrow bc my friends like her, bc she is good, or bc Amazon is marketing her relentlessly.

Amazon has a new sale on, of "150 Summer Steals". I don't plan on buying anything, but there are a lot of books I've heard of, either bc they are popular, classics, or movies, everything from Last Exit to Brooklyn to On the Waterfront, Erma Bombeck to Gloria Steinem. The sci-fi choices seem particularly interesting, including a book from Buzz Aldrin, William Shatner, Timothy Zahn, Theodore Sturgeon, Alan Dean Foster, and Octavia E. Butler. Actually, the second poll question is my top two picks from the list.

While pulling in the links for this post, I discovered Malcolm Gladwell has a new book coming out in October. I bet my boyfriends will enjoy Bill Bryson's One Summer: America, 1927. Between Amity Shlae's Coolidge biography and this new book, it feels like people are really interested in pre-Depression America suddenly. I won't buy any of those new books from the third question though: I got a few more shinies recently but still haven't been able to pull the trigger on new books. The fourth question is the most likely candidates and if I get my most urgent work done today, maybe I'll click order. I've been talking about moving and real estate a lot in the past few days and I've been trying for a few weeks to read down the piles of books in my apt.

Speaking of things I never get around to... Ai recently posted to Twitter about wanting to watch Hannibal, Elementary, and Orphan Black, which reminded me I wanted to watch the first two. I love that they've planned out a 7 season arc for Hannibal. How do people have time for tv AND reading? I am coming to realize that (a) I need a certain amount of passive entertainment, either stories or tv, but not video games and (b) when I start playing mindless/simple video games, I should stop and do something more passive, bc my neurotransmitters are low.

2 more things: in case you didn't know, Apple is celebrating the fifth anniversary of iTunes with an app giveaway including Day One and Infinity Blade 2. I was amused to find a Starbucks coupon for Over in the house, while I was downloading it as part of the giveaway. Also, for New Yorkers, AmEx is giving $5 statement credits if you spend $25 at a Restaurant Week restaurant, which is the best RW promo they've offered yet.
katestine: (pirate)
Before we went to Gettysburg, one of my smartest cow orkers recommended Shelby Foote's Stars in the Their Courses. I barely finished The Killer Angels in time, so I never got to it, but when I was prepping for our trip to Fredericksburg/Chancellorsville, I thought Foote's The Longest Journey might be a good overview of the campaigns in the area. It wasn't. Foote jumps from venue to venue, telling you what this general was doing in Mississippi and that one was doing in Virginia and... The prose is beautiful but I couldn't form a good picture in my head of what was going on. Not sure if this is because it is one ninth of a looooong set or bc I just don't have enough background knowledge on the Civil War. I suppose I'm still up for a book about the area, although maybe someday Jon and I should just go on a little Civil War tour. Also, I think I grokked Fredericksburg enough - which is a shame bc it's the one half marathon that month that's on my radar that isn't sold out or a flight away - but I still don't have a great sense of Chancellorsville, let alone the Wilderness or Spotsylvania battles.

In contrast, James McPherson's War on the Waters was the perfect book for me. Jon enjoyed his Battle Cry of Freedom and mid-nineteenth century naval warfare is just close enough to Age of Sail that my readings in that area helped. I liked how every chapter was about some major engagement or campaign, with a bit of the interim history, and I liked that the book was only as long as it needed to be. After reading the book, I understood the importance of North Carolina's coast in the Civil War.

There were things I didn't like. McPherson introduces far too many names, which is confusing when you're listening and trying to figure out if you need to remember the name or just what happened in an anecdote. This is particularly hard bc McPherson frequently quotes personal letters to relate what happened. He also spends a lot of time discussing the legal issues of the Civil War: e.g. how Abraham Lincoln danced around the question of the South's belligerent status, the legality of the blockade, and how Union diplomats blocked the sale of warships to the South. Despite Julian's best efforts, I still don't grok the distinctions between letters of marque, privateers, etc.

I don't remember McPherson's explanation of why he focused on accounts from the North for his source materials; it was legit, but it meant there were details missing and the story felt skewed. He frequently quotes Union naval officials, but rarely Confederate naval officials, even though he frequently claims the South was more innovative. I'd've liked more explanation of that innovation, since he describes the Dahlgren guns everyone was using (Dolgren's first front-line command was attacking Charleston) and spends a chapter on ironclads without describing the South's contribution on that front.

I also still don't understand why New Orleans fell so easily, other than Farragut was da bomb jiggedy. McPherson explains in the introduction that at the start of the war, the North had (almost) all the ships, but a substantial portion of the sailors went with the South, so they ended up recruiting from the merchant marine. Under the circumstances, I would've expected the South to staff everything they had that floats with experienced, overqualified officers who would kick the butt of any jumped-up merchant captain. Instead, if memory serves, New Orleans, the biggest port in the CSA, was defended by a flotilla of civilians. What?? Maybe i've read too much Patrick O'Brian, but I'd think a bunch of Jack Aubreys in some small sloops could capture a bunch of large prizes and start turning the tides.

I wish I could remember at this point which individual reminded me of Sonja Hemphill, but there were multiple incidents that reminded me of the Honor Harrington books. Does anyone know if David Weber has actually stated that he drew inspiration from that war? Obviously I noticed the French Revolution bits (Rob S. Pierre made that hard to miss) and I know David Drake's Cinnabar books are an Aubrey-Maturin pastiche. I've always assumed the early Posleen books were a re-fighting of the Civil War (complete with cannibalistic, mechanized villains; "aw shucks" heroic defenders; a heroic win at Fredericksburg; and alien carpetbaggers). With LMB's life on the Mississippi series, you'd think the Baen authors write nothing but Southern history.
katestine: (reading)
I've already whined on Twitter about Baen limiting access to the CDs on the Internets (although it led to a hilarious exchange with my favoritest IP lawyer). However, raising the price of the books - to $9-$10! - and making it so you can't buy monthly bundles for past months?! What the hell?! Thank goodness the NY Public Library has 12 copies on order - and only 1 person ahead of me in the reserve queue - bc there are few Baen authors worth $10 a pop. For $3 more, I could be reading Nate Silver's The Signal and the Noise, which is about numbers. *grumbles*

I also grumbled on Twitter about how painful it is to read Nook books on the iPad. I'm sure there are combinations of settings that will make it a pleasant reading experience, but wow. I never want to buy another Nook book again, even if I did finally find my password again.
katestine: (reading)
I could feel bad that I didn't read a single book while I was gone - while Jon read books about Thermopylae and the Civil War - or I could note that I finished two challenging audiobooks while I was there and maybe my brain is fatigued. I read less crep these days - mostly bc I don't have the patience - but my serious reading isn't that much higher :(

Part of it is I've given up on most of the authors whose new releases I used to put in my calendar - David Weber, LKH, among others. I liked the end of Changes so much, I'm sorry I read Ghost Story. It took me 3 tries to read most of Monster Hunter Alpha and I couldn't really tell you why I didn't pick up the second Grim Noir book. The Soulless series got silly. The descriptions of Alice Hoffman's and Susan Elizabeth Phillips' most recent books left me cold. I'm waiting for Riordan to finish the Roman halfling series before I pick up Son of Neptune.

I will say, I'm looking forward to Captain Vorpatril's Alliance - I just have to wait 16 days to save $9 and buy the book instead of the eARC. *hides the marshmallow* The Kildar is going to Asia in January and the first quarter of the book is up. Steve White has finally written a sequel to his time travel + Greek gods book, Blood of the Heroes.

I got rejected from a job in 2.5 days, which I think deserves an extra big shiny, and was polite to an idiot recruiter, whose job was rightly not interested in me either, which I think deserves a small shiny. I would buy a month of Audible, except I only have 9 hours of running left this month.

I'm really curious about The Black Count, which sounds like stranger than fiction awesomeness. However, I also have a knee high pile of fascinating books my once and present partners have lent me. I better get reading.

Edit: And then I forgot the real reason I had to post this right now, which is that American Gods and The Gift of Fear are going cheap in the Amazon Kindle store in this month's deal. Heart-Shaped Box is too, which I've always been curious about bc of the hype, except it's horror and I don't read horror. ah well. I like the idea of today's Kindle Daily Deal - 13 articles by TED authors - except that I'm not curious about any of the topics. I'm impressed with how TED has become a brand name for intellectualism and I should go back to watching TED tv while my boyfriend dresses for work.
katestine: (underoos)
My alarm clock died a few weeks ago and I decided yesterday I should replace it. Unfortunately, the totally excellent alarm clock I picked out on ThinkGeek, the one I'd desperately been waiting for my current alarm clock to die for, with Stephen Fry as Jeeves bidding you good morning, is no longer sold. Amazon doesn't have it either, but I found another place on the Internet that sells it... for $73. Which is a lot for, y'know, an alarm clock, especially since I could get an inexpensive iPhone dock (and maybe a cool wakeup app) for less.

Are there alarm clocks you like?

I thought about getting a clocky, but I don't have much trouble getting up in the morning and when I do, I often have someone in bed who might not appreciate the hijinks of me bouncing around the room looking for something in the dark. The Star Wars action figure mini-alarm clocks are mildly entertaining, except it's not Jon's fandom and more importantly, I don't want Boba Fett or Darth Vader waking me up in the morning. Grr.

Also, I need to stop looking at ThinkGeek before I buy all the things.

Edit: On the one hand, a natural light alarm clock might be great, bc I get up to the sun anyhow. On the other hand, it'll be a bit rough on whoever's in bed with me. Anyone have experience with one of these?
katestine: (tv)
I'm having a slightly tough morning bc (a) I didn't get home from dinner with the siblings until 11; (b) I woke up at 5 and didn't go back to bed bc I wanted to run before it got too hot, but then didn't run; (c) I have no coffee bc my coffee pot is scarily dirty and I haven't accumulated enough dishes to run the dishwasher; (d) my split pea soup didn't do well in the freezer; and (e) I just went through a third of the accumulated mail from while I was gone and I'm going to be on the phone with Verizon, my main bank, the insurance company, the COBRA administrators, and a few doctors in the next few days. ugh.

Good things: I made myself a really nice cup of the tea my uncle bought me in HK after we ate in the restaurant. I had a salad topped with duck, foie gras, and sausage, chased by a tea-infused macaroon. Just thinking about that meal makes me hate life less. I have a fridge full of food, including ingredients for two different Madhur Jaffrey recipes that are relatively healthy and full of spices. Also, I'm very excited to get dressed up this evening and have drinks and maybe use my brain. I might get to wear one of my new dresses. Further, I weighed myself this morning and I was under 112lbs; I don't think I've weighed that little since hs. It takes a little of the sting out of yesterday's disastrous weights session. Bad: I'm lifting what was my warmup weight 3 months ago. Worse: I can't take advantage of my abnormally low weight to rack up achievements on Fitocracy. Uh...

But that's not the point of this post. Today I'm going to cheer myself up by talking about all the stuff I watched while I was gone. My mother was confused when I said I was looking forward to the 16hr flight: yes, Cathay Pacific has come up with innovative ways to torture passengers, but they also provide a fully loaded tv so. I'm glad I caught The Muppets on the way over: it was cute and I'd've been sad if I missed it, but it wasn't worth a movie ticket. I was particularly happy to see Amy Adams in another adorable singing role.

More importantly, they had the first 8 episodes of Once Upon A Time, which is basically the tv version of the Fables comics, with Jennifer Morrison (aka the hottie from the first 3 seasons of House). I caught part of one episode once on tv and thought it was stupid, which was disappointing. The show started slow, but I kept watching and now I'm kicking myself I didn't get the box set while I was in China, bc it's not on Netflix and grr, I want to see what happens next.

The women on the trip brought an iPad stocked with prior seasons of How I Met Your Mother and we watched 8 episodes in two days while waiting for the rest of the team to come down from the high camps of Ama Dablam. I still don't get the frame tale: how do they not know their mother's name?? It's basically Friends for this generation, right? But I would totally look up the Wiki article when the show concludes to find out what happened/who their mother is.

However, I was most looking forward to watching Game of Shadows while on the plane: it was playing both ways! and I missed both gay ninja Sherlock Holmes movies while they were in theaters. Then I watched the first 20 mins and had to turn it off before I vomited. It's basically "Robert Downey Jr wants to play an action hero rather than a mecha", isn't it. And horrifyingly awful, even if one ignores that Sherlock Holmes would never act like that.

Instead, inspired by my visit to HK's equivalent to the Walk of Fame, I watched Flying Swords of Dragon Gate. I'd say you know it's going to be an excellent movie when there's a good fight scene in the first 10mins, but see above. There were some slow moments and there was an 11 o'clock Heel-Face-Turn that made absolutely no sense, but still way better than the Holmes reboot.

My aunt and uncle lent me the first two seasons of Downton Abbey and I picked up a copy of Kings, bc the NYPL lost its copy. I find it interesting that both my aunt and her houseguest from America said, "Oh yeah, I saw that, I wanted to watch more/I wondered what happened to that show" about the latter, but it was cancelled in its first season. oh well.

I read more books in the past 7 weeks than in the prior 14, but that's a whole 'nuther (series of) post(s).
katestine: (reading)
There's a slew of entertaining movies that are described as zany and screwball, but in books, this doesn't work so well.

Back when Fictionwise was a good deal and the Kindle and the Nook were top secret, I bought a few Janet Evanovich books, in part bc the Empress and/or Capps recommended the Stephanie Plum books. Back to the Bedroom doesn't have a very compelling description on the back - "the story of a young woman with the soul of a birthday cake living in a bran muffin house -- and a nice-looking guy with the substance of a bran muffin living in a birthday cake. They share some misadventures, some romantic moments, some misunderstandings, and ultimately they turn into wedding cake." After reading it, I still don't understand all this talk of bran and birthday cake. The heroine is a too serious cellist; the hero is an overgrown kid. Their adventures involve things falling out of the sky, fires, and the FBI, which might work in a Hepburn-Tracy flick, but in a book it just seems ridiculous. Maybe if it was done surrealistically, like in a Murakami novel.

James Lileks is one of my two all-time favorite bloggers, so I was happy to pay an absurd amount for Mr. Obvious, one of his out-of-print novels, back before he announced he was writing a new one. It took me years to get past the first chapter though, bc the story is absurd in a very uncharacteristic way. Sure, there's the occasional Lileksian turns of phrases that make me squee, but he's so focused on throwing in details about the newspaper and radio businesses, the story never becomes transporting. And then there's the absurdity of Marxist food terrorists (which were probably funnier in 1995) and insane shock jocks. I think I like his stories when he's writing about his trips to Target and raising young Miss Natalie.
katestine: (reading)
The only thing I can say without somehow spoiling Twilight's Dawn is that if you enjoyed the prior Black Jewels books, you should definitely read this one too. I would recommend having read the original trilogy and probably Dreams Made Flesh (the last short story collection) and Tangled Webs (the "spooky house" book) before this one; the three books about Dena Nehele in many ways constitute their own, mildly-related trilogy. Twilight's Dawn is a collection of four novellas with the first two taking place between DMF and TW and the second two taking place well after. which is probably a spoiler, although maybe not if I don't mention they're a spoiler oops )

My biggest criticism of the book is how long does it take someone from the long-lived races to mature anyhow? [elided] ) seems to be a child for many decades. According to a FAQ on the author's site, the long-lived races live 4500-5000 years, but I wouldn't think that would mean a 40-50x longer childhood. Also, zomg, could you imagine spending centuries in school? By the time you left, you should know, like, everything, especially in a world that has the normal complement of countries but no science or applied mathematics. Also, if [elided] ) spends that much time as a kid, you'd think someone who was 75% long-lived race would make have zir Birthright Ceremony at a much later age than 15?

Also, this might be a spoiler too, but whatever happened to Wilhelmina Benedict, Jaenelle's sister? She emigrated in the final book and then we never hear of her again.

In the end, I can confidently recommend the Black Jewels stories to friends who don't mind (or prefer) a touch of kink in their fantasy. It's still the best representation of power exchange I've seen in any book. Dagnabbit, my concluding sentence is mildly spoileriffic too (for Cryoburn and the Dresden Files as well as Twilight's Dawn) )

PS - The Amazon summary is spoileriffic too, so it's not just that I suck at keeping secrets.
katestine: (reading)
If you like Karrin Murphy, you should read Side Jobs: in some bizarre way, this Harry Dresden anthology ends up being about her, starting with the first time she encountered the wizard to, well, "Aftermath", or what she did an hour after the end of Changes. Even if you've been completely obsessive about tracking down every anthology to which Jim Butcher contributed and checked his website - not that we know anyone like that - the anthology in which the second to last story, "Love Hurts", was published, wasn't released until after Side Jobs, so it's not just "Aftermath" that'll be new. In each of those anthologies (oops, did I let that cat out of the bag?), the Dresden story was one of the better stories in the bunch, but that's not saying much. Side Jobs is a great service to fans bc individually, most of these stories are not worth tracking down, but taken together, they give a wonderful sense of the people in Harry's life and what's happening when he's not facing major battles. I've long thought a similar set of stories in the Anita Blake-iverse would make a wonderful tv show.

As for "Aftermath", it's probably a spoiler to say that there's not much in the way of spoilers. It's a nice story about some of the characters we like, but it could've been set in a different point in Harry's life with very little re-writing. Shows off Butcher's developing mastery of his craft, but if we want to know what happens next, we're going to have to wait until March 29, when Ghost Story comes out.

Profile

katestine

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324252627 28 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
OSZAR »